Shopping group health for your team
For decades, providing employee health insurance meant participating in a defined benefit model: an employer selected a group health plan (or perhaps two), negotiated the rates, agreed to cover a percentage of the premium, and absorbed the inevitable annual rate hikes. The traditional fully-insured group model forces businesses to guess what coverage best serves a diverse workforce, often resulting in younger, healthier employees paying for coverage they don’t use, while employees with complex health needs find the chosen network inadequate.
The introduction of the Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement (ICHRA) and the Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) legally shifted that paradigm.
These modern HRA structures represent a “defined contribution” model. Instead of buying a specific insurance policy for your workforce, you provide a tax-free allowance. Your employees take that allowance to the individual market, purchase a policy that fits their specific needs—choosing among carriers in Utah like Select Health, University of Utah Health Plans, BridgeSpan, or Molina—and you reimburse them up to their allowance limit.
This guide is written specifically for Utah business owners, CFOs, and HR leads. It breaks down the exact mechanics, compliance burdens, and financial considerations of deploying an ICHRA or QSEHRA, helping you determine whether transitioning to a defined contribution model is the right strategic move for your company.
Before diving into the specific rules of ICHRA versus QSEHRA, it is essential to understand how a premium-reimbursing HRA actually works day-to-day. An HRA is not an insurance policy. It is a formal, IRS-approved, employer-funded arrangement that reimburses employees for individual health insurance premiums and, optionally, out-of-pocket medical expenses.
The workflow operates in four distinct phases:
This mechanism immediately solves two massive headaches for HR leaders. First, it entirely removes the employer from the business of evaluating networks, deductibles, and carrier disputes. Second, it institutes absolute cost predictability. If a business budgets $400 per employee per month, its maximum liability is exactly $400 per employee per month, regardless of whether healthcare costs in Utah spike by 15% the following year.
The Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA), created by regulations that took effect in 2020, was designed to be the ultimate flexible tool for employers of any size. It is the most robust and customizable defined-contribution arrangement available under current tax law.
Unlike QSEHRA, the ICHRA has no employer size limit. It applies to small businesses, large mid-market organizations, and massive enterprise corporations alike. Any employer with at least one W-2 employee (who is not a self-employed owner) can set up an ICHRA.
The defining feature of an ICHRA is the ability to divide your workforce into distinct “classes” and offer different allowance amounts—or even entirely different benefits—to each class. Under federal rules, employers can establish classes based on legitimate, objective employment criteria, including:
This class structure offers unparalleled strategic flexibility. For example, a Utah hospitality group could offer a traditional fully-insured group plan to its salaried corporate executives, while simultaneously offering an ICHRA to its hourly resort staff. Or, a tech company based in Salt Lake City with remote workers across the country could offer $500/month to its Utah-based employees and $700/month to employees in California, compensating for the different premium costs in different geographic rating areas.
Crucial Compliance Note: While you can offer different benefits to different classes, you cannot offer the same employee a choice between an ICHRA and a traditional group health plan. The offering must be universally applied within that specific class.
Within a specific class, employers must treat all employees on the same terms, but they are allowed to scale the allowance based on age and family size.
Because older employees face higher premiums on the individual market (under ACA rules, a 64-year-old can be charged up to three times as much as a 21-year-old), employers can structure the ICHRA allowance to increase with age. The maximum permitted ratio is 3:1. If you offer a 21-year-old a $300 monthly allowance, you can offer a 64-year-old up to $900. You can also increase the allowance for employees who are purchasing family or couple coverage.
For Applicable Large Employers (ALEs)—businesses with 50 or more Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) employees—the Affordable Care Act mandates that the employer provide “minimum essential coverage” that is “affordable” and provides “minimum value,” or face severe tax penalties.
An ICHRA can satisfy the employer mandate, but compliance requires precise mathematical structuring.
To satisfy the mandate, the ICHRA allowance must make the lowest-cost Silver plan available to the employee on their local exchange “affordable.” The IRS sets an affordability threshold every year (a specific percentage of the employee’s household income). Because employers rarely know an employee’s total household income, the IRS allows employers to use safe harbors, such as ensuring the employee’s remaining premium contribution doesn’t exceed the set percentage of their W-2 wages, their rate of pay, or the Federal Poverty Line.
If an ALE fails to offer a large enough allowance to make that lowest-cost Silver plan affordable, and the employee goes to the marketplace, buys a plan, and receives a Premium Tax Credit (subsidy), the employer will be hit with an Employer Shared Responsibility Payment penalty. Managing affordability calculations across different age bands and geographic areas is complex, which is why ALEs utilizing ICHRAs rely heavily on sophisticated benefits software.
| Feature | ICHRA (Individual Coverage) | QSEHRA (Small Employer) | Traditional Group Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employer Size Limit | None (1 to 10,000+ employees) | Strictly under 50 FTEs | None |
| Maximum Contribution Limit | No legal limit. Employer decides. | Capped annually by the IRS. | No legal limit. |
| Employee Classes Allowed? | Yes (Salaried, Hourly, Geographic, etc.) | No. Must offer to all full-time employees. | Yes, depending on carrier rules. |
| Satisfies ACA Mandate? | Yes, if structured to meet affordability rules. | N/A (Only for businesses exempt from mandate). | Yes. |
| Interaction with APTC (Subsidies) | If affordable, employee loses subsidy. If not, they can opt out of ICHRA to keep subsidy. | Employee's subsidy is reduced dollar-for-dollar by the QSEHRA allowance. | Employee loses subsidy entirely. |
The QSEHRA was introduced by the 21st Century Cures Act in 2016, predating the ICHRA. It was explicitly created to help small businesses that were priced out of the group market offer some level of tax-advantaged health benefit. While less flexible than an ICHRA, it remains a highly effective tool for micro-businesses and small agencies.
QSEHRAs are exclusively for non-ALEs. Your business must have fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees, and you cannot offer a traditional group health plan to any employee. If you sponsor a group vision or dental plan, you may still be eligible, but any group major medical plan disqualifies the company from utilizing a QSEHRA.
Unlike ICHRAs, QSEHRAs do not allow for complex employee classes. The foundational rule of a QSEHRA is the “same terms” requirement. You must offer the HRA to all eligible full-time employees. You can safely exclude part-time employees, seasonal employees, employees under age 25, and those who haven’t completed a 90-day waiting period, but beyond that, everyone gets the benefit.
Furthermore, QSEHRA contributions are subject to hard annual limits set by the IRS. While an employer can give an ICHRA participant $2,000 a month if they choose, QSEHRA allowances are legally capped. The exact limits adjust annually for inflation, but a business owner cannot exceed the federal maximums for self-only or family allowances.
You are permitted to vary the QSEHRA allowance based on age or family size, but the variation must be tied to the price of a specific benchmark plan on the local exchange, making the calculation more rigid than the ICHRA’s simple 3:1 ratio allowance.
One of the most significant differences between an ICHRA and a QSEHRA is how they interact with Advanced Premium Tax Credits (APTCs), the subsidies low- and moderate-income employees receive on the ACA marketplace.
Transitioning from a traditional group health plan to a defined contribution model is a major structural shift. Business leaders do not undertake it lightly. The decision is driven by distinct financial and operational advantages.
The most cited reason CFOs transition to an ICHRA is the elimination of the annual renewal negotiation. In a traditional group plan, if your workforce utilizes their insurance heavily (a few difficult pregnancies, an employee requiring expensive biologic medications, a severe accident), your group’s “experience” worsens. The following year, the carrier issues a massive rate hike.
With an HRA, your budget is disconnected from employee health claims. If you budget a 4% increase in benefits compensation for the year, you simply raise the HRA allowance by 4%. The employer shifts the risk of healthcare inflation and catastrophic claims back to the broader individual insurance pool, insulating the company’s balance sheet.
To the IRS, a compliant HRA is treated identically to a traditional group health plan.
Traditional fully-insured group plans generally require 70% to 75% of your eligible employees to enroll to initiate or maintain the policy. In industries with lower-wage workers or high turnover, hitting that minimum participation rate is notoriously difficult, effectively locking the company out of the group market.
An ICHRA has zero minimum participation requirements. If you offer the HRA to 100 employees and only 12 decide to buy a policy and claim the allowance, the plan remains fully compliant and operational. You simply keep the funds the other 88 employees didn’t use.
Utah has a dynamic workforce landscape. A company headquartered in Provo might employ remote workers in rural Garfield County, software developers in Salt Lake City, and sales staff in Duchesne County.
Attempting to find one group plan network that adequately covers all those territories is nearly impossible without paying a massive premium for a broad national PPO. Under an HRA, the remote worker in Garfield County can use their allowance to buy a locally optimized plan, while the executive in Salt Lake City buys a completely different policy with a network catering to urban research hospitals. Everyone gets coverage that actually works where they live.
Determine whether ICHRA or QSEHRA is the correct compliance track for your business.
A common misconception among business owners is that moving to an HRA means washing their hands of benefits administration entirely. “We just give them money and let them figure it out.”
This is dangerously false. HRAs are formal employer-sponsored health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Internal Revenue Code. Running one non-compliantly exposes a business to devastating IRS penalties.
Virtually no employer runs an ICHRA or QSEHRA on their own using spreadsheets and direct deposits. The administrative and legal requirements mandate the use of a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) or specialized HRA software platform. Here is exactly what must be managed:
For the business owner, an HRA is an exercise in finance and compliance. For the HR lead, the biggest challenge of an HRA is employee education and change management.
Most employees have never shopped for health insurance. They are accustomed to HR handing them a packet with two choices (a PPO and an HMO), checking a box, and moving on. Transitioning to an ICHRA requires employees to navigate the individual market themselves. Without rigorous internal communication and support, the rollout will cause immense frustration.
An employee cannot simply buy individual health insurance in the middle of July unless they have a qualifying life event. Fortunately, an employer offering an ICHRA or QSEHRA constitutes a qualifying event.
When the HRA takes effect, employees are granted a 60-day Special Enrollment Period. They must use this window to log onto the ACA exchange (or work with a licensed broker) to purchase a policy.
To access HRA funds tax-free, the employee must be enrolled in individual health insurance coverage. Not all coverage qualifies.
When employees go to the individual market in Utah, they will encounter carriers that dominate the state’s ACA exchange.
In the Salt Lake City and Provo corridors, networks like Select Health and University of Utah Health Plans are highly prominent, offering robust local facility access. Employees prioritizing broad networks might lean toward one option, while younger, healthier employees might choose a localized HMO from a carrier like Imperial Health Plan of the Southwest to minimize their out-of-pocket premium.
The employee pays the premium to the carrier (either upfront or through an employer-facilitated payroll deduction depending on the setup) and the HRA reimburses them.
HSAs are incredibly popular in Utah. HR leads frequently ask: Can an employee have an HRA and an HSA at the same time?
The IRS rules are strict: an individual cannot contribute to an HSA if they have “first-dollar” coverage. Because a standard HRA reimburses medical expenses before the deductible is met, it disqualifies the employee from HSA contributions.
To preserve HSA eligibility, the employer must specifically design the ICHRA or QSEHRA in one of two ways:
If HSA compatibility is a priority for your workforce, this design choice must be finalized in the ERISA plan documents before the plan year begins.
The most critical decision an owner makes when implementing an HRA is setting the allowance amount. Set it too low, and employees will leave for competitors offering robust traditional benefits. Set it too high, and you negate the cost-control advantages of the HRA model.
Employers should approach the allowance mathematically:
If the HRA allowance is $400, but the employee chooses a plan that costs $600, how does the employee pay the remaining $200?
Under an ICHRA, if the employer properly establishes a Section 125 Premium Only Plan (POP) alongside the HRA, the employee can pay the remaining $200 through pre-tax payroll deductions—but only if they buy their plan off-exchange (direct from the carrier).
Under IRS rules, a Section 125 plan cannot be used to pay for a plan purchased through the public ACA exchange on a pre-tax basis. This creates a strategic fork in the road. If pre-tax deductions are highly important to your staff, you must work with a broker or TPA to facilitate off-exchange enrollment for your ICHRA participants.
Moving a business from a fully-insured group plan to an ICHRA is a multi-month project. Rushing the implementation leads to compliance failures and employee panic. A standard timeline looks like this:
While ICHRAs are powerful, they are not the only alternative to the traditional group market. HR leads must evaluate the HRA model against other modern funding strategies.
Level-funded plans are the bridge between traditional fully-insured plans and true self-funding. In a level-funded plan, the employer pays a set monthly premium, but if the group’s medical claims run lower than expected over the year, the employer receives a rebate or credit.
Some micro-businesses cannot afford major medical coverage at all and attempt to substitute it by offering only fixed-indemnity supplemental coverage (like Aflac or accident policies). This is a flawed strategy. Supplemental policies do not provide major medical protection, do not satisfy ACA mandates, and leave employees highly vulnerable to catastrophic debt.
A QSEHRA or ICHRA, even funded with a modest allowance of $150 or $200 a month, is vastly superior. It enables the employee to buy real ACA-compliant major medical insurance, using the employer’s tax-free contribution to significantly offset the premium.
To solidify how these tools operate in practice, consider how three very different Utah businesses might deploy them.
A software firm with 35 employees is looking to recruit high-tier talent. Their workforce is split between Salt Lake City and remote developers in Texas. They want to offer competitive benefits but cannot manage the administrative nightmare of finding a multi-state group plan.
A manufacturer in Duchesne County with 120 employees is struggling with severe rate hikes on their traditional group plan because the workforce is older and has high utilization. They are an ALE and must offer affordable coverage to avoid penalties.
A catering company with 15 full-time employees and 40 part-time/seasonal workers cannot qualify for a traditional group plan because they cannot meet minimum participation requirements.
Find out if an ICHRA, QSEHRA, or traditional group plan makes the most financial sense for your business and workforce.
Get a Free Consultation